Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk

Jan-8-2008 17:29

I've noticed how I have picked up certain superstitions when playing Sleuth that help me decide who I'm going to question and who I suspect. Some I'm trying to stop doing. I didn't like going straight back to a suspect who I've used lock picking on because they might realise I broke in (OK... I thought this when I first started playing it because they always seemed to clam). Others are things like positions the suspect appears on the sleuth helper (very top or very bottom seem guilt more often than they should be :/ ).

I was just wondering if anyone else has other susperstitions when they play, like a first name they always suspect or an avatar that always seem to be the killer?

Jan-8-2008 19:29

This is half superstition, half truth.

Ben hates me. Always has. Always will.

Jan-8-2008 22:43

My superstitions are related to the game being sentient and actually learning as i play so it can stop me from solving a case.

Jan-9-2008 09:15

When on a TH, if I need a favor for the Barber, I will go to him constantly while working toward the next favor and ask if he needs on even though I know that I still have more to do to get a favor. I will do this during cases, after cases, before cases, anytime I go to see him. This is all in the hopes that he will eventually get tired of me asking and finally say. ok do the favor then leave me alone!

Jan-9-2008 11:13

I find when I get Bens avatar he is the guilty party 90% of the time. ; )
So I usually check him out first.

Also I think that my client is guilty more often on the third case after a favor.

Jan-9-2008 14:07

Lefties and clients are my two most likely guilty people. When I come across a left-handed note, it's usually the one I look at first, and more often than not, that's the one. And when I'm at the end of my evidence-checking and still haven't nailed anybody down yet and need to go to W/E, if the client's still a viable suspect, he/she's at the top of the list. More often than not, I'm right.

The Music Teacher also seems to hate everyone in my Agency. When I happen to find a favor from her, I usually handcuff her to the Agency's basement wall til we need her. We think when a hunt comes up, she goes off on a romatic assignation to Delhi with the Fortune Teller. ;-)

Jan-9-2008 15:02

I'm stalked by this Henry Newsom person. He shows up in about half of my cases (at least it feels like it). What do he want from me? I can't remember if he ever has been the killer, he just lurch around and always have a good excuse.

Jan-9-2008 15:10

lol I have heaps.

If my avatar is the client I am invariably guilty.
If I have the Tailor as my contact and I get three threads and one note, it'll be the note that I want.
If I get four notes and one is left handed, I always go (like Breit) to the left handed person first.
If I have to choose a Suspect to ask Witness Evidence about, I always choose who is highest on the list first. And then if available the bottom person on the list, then go back to who is next highest... *twitches*
I used to go males then females, but I went off that last year.

That's a good start, magic troll dolls, finger crossing, and mystic chanting aside.

Jan-9-2008 15:45

I use my own privately developed "automated sleuth helper", and in contradction to what are experienced when you sleuth the normal way, all the new suspects are put in the bottom of the list, in the order they are revealed. Then, when a case need more suspects (ie. the last suspect), the one most likely to tell me who that last suspect are, is the second last revealed suspect. I guess there are some statistically reason for why, but my experience are that more than half the times, this second last will know the last suspect (if his motive question is not already used of course...)

Jan-9-2008 17:53

On my previous detective i used to have judge of character. On this one, i don't. However i still insist on clicking on the button to judge even though i don't have it. And then i go to sweet talking. And i usually cringe a little or shut my eyes to convince myself it won't work to perhaps trick the computer into doing me a favor. Totally stupid, right? It hardly ever works.

Also, if the client has a fake alibi or is lacking one completely then i immediately head for him or her first, no reason why.

If a person is a mean looking woman i generally consider them the killer (Sorry girls, i really have no problem with you).

And i always go through all of the witnesses that i didn't get any info form the townspeople from first before hitting up the people that know who the murderer is.

I also am convinced that if a person knows the murderer but has a fake alibi that they are guilty most of the time. And that if the person has a fake alibi but knows nothing they are usually not the killer. Not true all the time however.

Jan-9-2008 18:39

Who is the guilty one?:
The one who hides is likely;
the one who has clammed;
the one who has the same alibi as the evidence in question;
or failing that, the one with the most ridiculous name.

Yup - works for me.