 |
|
Less evidence is better...
|
Dractas
|
Mar-19-2005 18:33
Am I thie only one who finds it odd that having more physical evidence makes a case harder to solve, not easier?
|
| Replies |
calalta
Well-Connected
|
Mar-19-2005 20:05
yes my all time favorites were the 4 hair cases in NYC, that barber hated me with a passion.
|
Sly Spy
|
Mar-20-2005 10:50
No problem with me because I rely more on getting fols to talk.
|
Meglet
|
Mar-22-2005 21:53
You know what's really nice? When one doesn't happen to have the handwriting analysis but one does manage to get the librarian for a contact. :D
|
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner
|
Mar-23-2005 07:26
Yes, harder cases have more physical evidence precisely because they have more misleading physical evidence. Less is definitely better if you're just talking about ease of solving.
|
jstkdn
Well-Connected
|
Mar-24-2005 04:07
Provided of course, you have found ALL evidence that is available. It sucks to not have found a piece of evidence when you just start playing, and the evidence that you do have do not point to the killer.
|
Arne
Old Shoe
|
Mar-24-2005 09:10
Another argument in favor of getting basic hair and thread ASAP
|
|
|
