Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Game Announcements


0 0
General Feedback
  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

Sleuth Admin
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner

Feb-22-2004 20:32

I have a couple of questions I'd like some feedback on. Please Answer by replying to this post.

1) Is the game fun? Really fun, kind of fun, funner than going to the dentist?

2) Can you think of anything that would make the game more fun?

3) Is the game too hard? Too easy?

Thanks
-Ben

Replies

MegAmy
MegAmy

May-10-2004 07:52

Hah! Wrote it down this time!

The Terrifying Excercise of the Lost Room.

I had 1 piece of physical evidence, 1 piece of witness evidence pointing to a person, so I accused her. Turned out to be a false accusation.

And no, the witness evidence did not come from the real killer.

Oh, the alibi thing might be the kicker, though. She clammed up on the alibi, so I had none for her.

Sleuth Admin
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner

May-10-2004 08:00

MegAmy,

Who did you falsely accuse?


Sleuth Admin
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner

May-10-2004 08:04

The female suspects were:
Jeanette, Daughter (the murderess)
Osberta, Friend (real alibi)
Ruby, Neighbor (no evidence)
Tabitha, Loan Shark (real alibi)
Cher, Lover (real alibi)

So, I don't see a bug.

MegAmy
MegAmy

May-10-2004 08:16

*blink*

I doublechecked Osberta, and what I had on my screen was a fake alibi. Believe me, I checked that before posting something so that I didn't look like a complete moron.

Apparently not well enough though.

Wayne Williams Jr.
Wayne Williams Jr.
Well-Connected

May-10-2004 08:49

If a suspect clams up before they answered about their alibi, that is not considered a "none" alibi.

A "none" alibi is when a suspect replies "It's none of your business, but I don't have an alibi." And then after that, the case file will label the suspect as "Alibi: None".

Is that what is causing the confusion? The misinterpretation of what is meant by "none alibi"?

Because I have never encountered a case with the said bug ever? :)???





Fat Chuck
Fat Chuck

May-10-2004 10:06

Sorry, MegAmy, I don't see how you can double check (and confirm) that they had a "fake alibi" when you say that they clammed on the alibi. A fake alibi is not the same thing as you not knowing whether or not they have one.

MegAmy
MegAmy

May-10-2004 10:51

Sorry.....confusing myself slightly, by misreading my notes later. Shorthand is fine for a moment, but later...yikes!

My point is that I've never seen an innocent person, with both pieces of evidence, even with them clamming up on the alibi question.

Sleuth Admin
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner

May-10-2004 12:01

The combination of evidence & no/fake alibi is what you're looking for. In most situations, 3 pieces of evidence pointing towards the same person is a pretty good indicator too, but you can't be sure until you confirm they have no valid alibi.


Kitten
Kitten

May-10-2004 16:27

It is commonplace to have innocent people with two or more pieces of evidence pointing towards them. Alibi/no alibi is the key. Alibi/ no alibi is much more important than the number of evidence towards different people. (And by "no alibi" I mean exactly what Wayne says above. I do not simply mean "the absence of a verified real alibi".)

I do think this is where the misunderstanding is, MegAmy :)

MegAmy
MegAmy

May-10-2004 21:12

I know, I know. Just because they don't say jack, doesn't mean that they don't have a valid alibi. *pout* :)

  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

[ You must login to reply ]