 |
|
|
Location of Physical Evidence
|
Deborha Lee
|
Aug-1-2005 01:29
Is this ever important? For instance: the difference between finding a thread NEAR the victim, as opposed to finding it under their fingernail?
Thanks!
Deborha Lee
|
| Replies |
reda
Well-Connected
|
Aug-1-2005 03:29
Nope
|
Deborha Lee
|
Aug-1-2005 07:58
Bummer! It would be cool if it did. Then we would have some idea of which physical evidence was more likely to belong to the killer. :)
|
Luniar Arkain
|
Aug-1-2005 16:10
Though some people say that the order of the physical evidence listed is by importance.
|
Cicero
Well-Connected
|
Aug-2-2005 04:40
Nah.
Evidence is evidence.
|
Ramses Emerson
|
Aug-5-2005 02:33
That kinda sucks. The order should not matter, but it would be really cool if the location, with relation to the victim, had some import. :P
|
cfm
Nomad
|
Aug-5-2005 07:55
The order does not matter. Don't try to read too much into the cases, unless it's a featured mystery. Follow the formulas.
PE+Fake/"none of your business" Alibi=guilty
WE+Fake/"none of your business" Alibi=guilty
2 WE = guilty
PE=Physical Evidence WE=Witness Evidence
|
gradbeth
Well-Connected
|
Aug-5-2005 09:55
what about PE + We does that equal guilt too?
|
cfm
Nomad
|
Aug-5-2005 12:14
Not always. PE+WE is a gamble and a good way to get a false accusation.
|
gradbeth
Well-Connected
|
Aug-5-2005 13:20
alright, thanks!!
|
|
|
