Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Newbie Questions


0 0
When Should I Accuse A Suspect?
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

jedihjc
jedihjc

Jul-3-2005 05:32

Okay, I know people have said it before numerous times around the forums, but for my sake and for the sake of all the other newbies...
What evidence should I have, besides a false alibi, before I accuse a suspect?

Replies

reda
reda
Well-Connected

Jul-3-2005 22:56

Same here. Could it be that you were wrong about the alibi Lady Gray?

V Buster
V Buster
Old Shoe

Jul-4-2005 02:40

I have heard circumstantial evidence about the WE and 1 false being incorrect, but do not yet have any proof. I believe the suspect died before the detective could accuse.

V Buster
V Buster
Old Shoe

Jul-4-2005 02:41

Oh, and I always accuse on 1 WE and false/nil.

Greyling
Greyling

Jul-4-2005 03:05

Witness Evidence + false/none of your business = the murderer - or else the tutorial definitely needs some adjustment :D

Lady Grey
Lady Grey

Jul-4-2005 06:45

Definitely right about the alibi. I had an unusual number of suspects that clammed after they had given me an alibi thus increasing the probability that the one WE I had was the mislead.
Usually you can get away with it although I have had one case where two suspects with False alibis pointed at each other and went "It was him" (This caused much grinding of teeth)

Greyling
Greyling

Jul-4-2005 07:44

But that really really shouldn't be possible - *perplexed look on her face*

reda
reda
Well-Connected

Jul-4-2005 07:53

*looking at the same direction in the same way*

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]