|
|
When Should I Accuse A Suspect?
|
jedihjc
|
Jul-3-2005 05:32
Okay, I know people have said it before numerous times around the forums, but for my sake and for the sake of all the other newbies...
What evidence should I have, besides a false alibi, before I accuse a suspect?
|
Replies |
reda
Well-Connected
|
Jul-3-2005 22:56
Same here. Could it be that you were wrong about the alibi Lady Gray?
|
V Buster
Old Shoe
|
Jul-4-2005 02:40
I have heard circumstantial evidence about the WE and 1 false being incorrect, but do not yet have any proof. I believe the suspect died before the detective could accuse.
|
V Buster
Old Shoe
|
Jul-4-2005 02:41
Oh, and I always accuse on 1 WE and false/nil.
|
Greyling
|
Jul-4-2005 03:05
Witness Evidence + false/none of your business = the murderer - or else the tutorial definitely needs some adjustment :D
|
Lady Grey
|
Jul-4-2005 06:45
Definitely right about the alibi. I had an unusual number of suspects that clammed after they had given me an alibi thus increasing the probability that the one WE I had was the mislead.
Usually you can get away with it although I have had one case where two suspects with False alibis pointed at each other and went "It was him" (This caused much grinding of teeth)
|
Greyling
|
Jul-4-2005 07:44
But that really really shouldn't be possible - *perplexed look on her face*
|
reda
Well-Connected
|
Jul-4-2005 07:53
*looking at the same direction in the same way*
|
|