Sleuth Home - Message Boards - The Gumshoe Lounge

Jun-13-2005 14:28

Oh the mystery of "The King of Pop!" The verdict is in & will be revealed at 4PM. Don't you know that Michael is nerveous, because his life is hanging in the balance. I know that I'm nerveous and it has nothing to do with me, except I've admired his talents, just not his life-style. I started this thread, thinking that some would like to share their feelings here about it. Oh well, the world shall soon know. As Texan just shared, this could be Micheal final walk in freedom, as he walks into the courthouse holding him umbrella. One thing about it, there won't be an umbrella needed in prison...ouch.

Jun-13-2005 18:29

Well, I will say this, after much thought, that if it had of been anyone else besides the women whom all the Juriors hated, Micheal would be in jail. I hate the fact that he allows the boys to sleep in his bed, and believe the parents are at fault for allowing it, if they know. I DO NOT like his actions, and for sure his behavior with children. He needs serious counseling. I pray that if someone else is out there that they will come forward and reveal the he's guilty.

Jun-13-2005 18:59

I find this whole situation very sad, that Jackson should come to this. His own childhood was far from normal from accounts. His music legacy epic, yet the potential damage his actions and those of the parents who let this go on is no exchange for musical talent.

Jun-13-2005 19:11

In my opinion, MJ is weird. But weird doen't necessarly make him guilty of the crimes he was accused of. I don't agree with his life-style, and with the thought that he sleeps with little boys. It is obsolutely unnatural and unhealthy. No one really knows the truth, except MJ and those involved. I would like to see him change his ways and not do the things that he does, which only puts questions in the minds of people. All it can do is cause people to wonder why someone would do such a thing. I know that I, as a father, would not want my child sleeping with someone like MJ, regardless if he's a pop star or not.

Jun-13-2005 19:36

Like I said, I have no clue if there was evidence showing he was actually guilty of what he was accused of.

There is few people that know a lot about me personally. Aside from being a mad poster, that lives in Holland.

But assume this.

Hello I am jstkdn. I had a different child hood from anyone else. I was so crazy about the king of rock and roll, that I not only called myself the king of pop, but also married his daughter. I really wanted her to have my children. I also built an amusement park in my back yard. Even though I am in my 40s. I enjoy if little boys sleep over. And give them some alcohol. We sleep in the same bed. But that's because I look at us as if being the same age. I don't do anythingn with them, I swear. I also have had so many plastic surgeries, that my face looks inhuman. I talk in a strange Mickey Mouse like voice. In fact on some days I think I actually *am* Mickey mouse. hahah. I also like to dress in strange looking outfits, 1 glove, and love to dance and grab my crotch a lot. Oh and when those kids get older, then I replace them with new kids. When they are old, they stop being my friend. I don't like little girls. Except the two daugthers that I had with a woman I paid.

What would you tell me?

What I would tell me.

You are freak, and need to commit yourself in to hospital.

And a childhood, doesn't give anyone an excuse to behave like a freak. No matter in what way. If you are a freak, you need to have therapy.

Jun-13-2005 19:38

(Though not necisarily put in jail.)
(Though definitely kept away from children, because of being a BAD role model.)

Jun-13-2005 20:43

hehehehe....that was so funny jstkdn. I could just hear Michael's voice as I read your message aloud to Texan, who started laughing along with me. I was in tears by the time I finsihed it...lol. You're hilarious, but made a good point. You asked what I'd think of you? Just what I've thought about Michael, and that is he looks like a freak. He's had so many plastic surgeries on his face, that I'm afraid when he's singing under the hot lights overhead, that they'll melt his face. Seriously, I've wondered. Anyway, I don't mean to make fun of him, but I agree that his actions are bizzare. Also, why would he want to change his facial features so drastically, including Janet, and Latoy? Are they ashamed to look black? I wondered what his parents thinks about them doing this? I told Texan today that this would be a slap in my face, if my children had all their features changed so they didn't favor me. Oh well, who knows why he does what he does.

Jun-13-2005 20:44

Correction: LaToya

Jun-13-2005 20:48

Hey, now I was only replying back to what you said above, what if this was actually you..lol. But, so glad you're not, and you're the sweet, funny and wonderful lady you are.

Jun-14-2005 00:27

I don't know if Michael Jackson is guilty or not, but I hope that he isn't because he is back out there and if he is, someone else is going to get hurt.
I know that if/when I have kids as a parent I would never let them over there. What parent could take such a chance that their child could be hurt. Maybe since it was such a public trial parents will be more aware and not just in awe of a celebrity wanting to spend time with their kid.

Jun-14-2005 03:06

I don't understand how anyone can definitely say whether or not Michael Jackson is guilty or innocent. I certainly don't understand the fans that have paraded with banners proclaiming his innocence - how could they possibly know?

Michael Jackson is an eccentric whose behaviour, at the very least, runs not only against what most people consider normal but also what most consider acceptable. If he is innocent, I think he has brought a lot of this on himself by his bizarre behaviour which obviously leaves him open to not only speculation but also allegations.

Unfortunately, I don't see this as a victory or testament to the effectiveness of the judicial system. All the verdict means is that there was reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors regarding the veracity of the allegations, and therefore they had to find him 'not guilty'.

Sadly, I think this case simply highlights the difficulty in proving or disproving an allegation of child abuse. Unless there is clear physical evidence, witnesses to the act of abuse or a confession on the apart of the abuser, it usually comes down to who a jury believes - the word of one against another. Under such circumstances, it's virtually impossible to really ever find out the truth about what happened.

Like some said earlier, if he's innocent, I'm glad he's been declared so. If he's guilty, then it's a frightening prospect that such a revered figure is be loose to continue whatever it is he's been doing. However, I don't think any of us can really know either way.