Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk

Jun-29-2004 02:14

Do witnesses ever give false positive evidence?

I just attempted "The Excruciating Hunt for the Lost Answer" - but one of the witnesses (Adelaide) said she saw something suspicious about Prudence (whom I accused) - but the real killer was Solomon!

Is this a bug??

Jul-2-2004 22:31

Once I got two pieces of evidence pointing to someone and accused her- it was really someone with only one piece of evidence, and that evidence was only witness evidence. Poop!

Jul-2-2004 22:36

"1 piece of evidence, of any variety, with a false alibi (and a motive) is all that is ever required"

Not quite. It's easy to get two pieces of evidence pointing to two different people, both of whom may have false or no alibis. It's best to have more than one piece of ecidence, 3 is best I think but I don't really know, I'm not great at this game :)

Jul-3-2004 00:39

1 piece of evidence and a fake alibi are enough to convict a suspect. End of story.

A few people have complained of experiencing cases where that wasn't true, but until now examination of these cases proved the players wrong.
I have solved 250 cases and never experienced something that invalidates the above.

Jul-3-2004 08:40

"It's easy to get two pieces of evidence pointing to two different people, both of whom may have false or no alibis."

It is not easy. It is impossible. It is only best to have more than one piece of evidence if you are careless with your notes and not sure who has false alibis. Even then, you are taking risks that you will get it wrong since I'm sure it is possible to have a physical and a witness evidence against an innocent person. (There are never 2 physical against the same person.)

Jul-3-2004 10:12

When I said I wasn't great at this game I meant it, it's ALWAYS possible I'm wrong. I just firgured since it seemed to have happened to me a couple of times that it would be possible. Maybe not, but that's my opinion on this... sorry if I'm wrong

Jul-5-2004 22:38

While some people are simply saying 1 piece of evidence, others are saying 1 piece of PHYSICAL evidence. Keep in mind that you CAN have 1 piece of WITNESS evidence pointing to someone with a fake alibi and it MAY NOT be that person. Keep that in mind as you are all fighing over this.

Jul-9-2004 19:12

Elsey is right. I have had this same problem. Then I was steered in the right direction and it has worked for me 100%. I always make sure i have at least 1 physical and 2 witness evidence. If I can only get one witness as long as the Suspect has a fake Alibi I have always accused and have been right. So I agree with Elsey and Greys previous statements. 1 physical 1 witness (Poss. 2) and a fake alibi. Can't go wrong

Jul-9-2004 19:19

people make such simple things much more complicated the they should

Jul-9-2004 22:34

Witness evidence is equally important with physical.
If you have ANY evidence (physical or witness) pointing to suspect "X", AND "X" has fake alibi, then "X" IS DEFINATELY the killer.

Jul-10-2004 18:47

What do you do if you have two pieces of evidence pointing to 2 different people and they both have false alibis? And all my other witnesses have stopped talking!
Scenario;
Suspect A - has been accused by Suspect B.
Suspect A - left threatening note.
Suspect B - left a "bloody footprint".
I didn't realise I needed to note how many motives were given bt each suspect, I just noted the motives. Any suggestions?