Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk

Jun-29-2004 00:02

When questioning a witness with 'Judge of character' it will state which method is 'easier' to use. How can I calculate which will work best: ie When for eg I have 10 tough, and say 4 charm, - is it more successful to use tough even though it states that it would be easier to sweet talk because of the skill level or clothes I'm wearing?

Jun-29-2004 00:19

I don't bother asking, and it's not due to my fear of rejection. I've found I get more answers going straight to charm and work around any clamming, which is very few, with physical and witness evidence. In your situation I'd stick to tough and don't give them an option.

Jun-29-2004 02:10

I wear all charm and even am in negative toughness. I've found that this work perfectly fine, and I don't even bother asking anymore either.

Jun-29-2004 05:40

asking whether they respond better to tough or charm, that is

Jun-29-2004 14:56

Yes I agree. I always just go for charm. I don't use judge of character any more.

Jun-29-2004 19:41

Drats! I knew I should've opted for Sweet TAlking instead of Interrogation. Now I've gone and blown it!

I slap suspects silly, up-down-centre, and still their jaws don't budge. MAybe we ought to have a doctor townsperson that can inject them with ANTI-TETANUS vaccines.

Jun-30-2004 13:27

Interrogation is still good D.L., I think that they just perfer sweet talking, like me.

Jun-30-2004 20:16

It's true. I am a non-violent person, so I opted for sweet talking. :)