Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
Burden of Proof
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

sirgarr
sirgarr

Mar-5-2004 22:03

Does anybody ever *falsely* suspect someone based on specific evidence (blood, watch)?

Does any evidence at the crime scene ever *falsely* point to someone (an innocent person's hair)?

Trying to figure out if you only need one piece of evidence to accuse someone.

- It would be awesome if this weren't the case and that people would lie or there'd be complications about the crime scene built into the plot. "The innocent person's hair was there because she was there the night before." "Person X lied to you about suspecting person Y because of a personal agenda."
- But if not, it would be cool to know that there's only one piece of evidence needed to speed up how long it takes to solve a case.

Replies

Sleuth Admin
Sleuth Admin
Tale Spinner

Mar-15-2004 20:11

Fat Chuck,

Yes, I've heard one other person mention a similar bug. I haven't seen it yet myself, but it's possible. I'll look into it.



Fat Chuck
Fat Chuck

Mar-16-2004 08:53

I drew up a matrix in Excel with exactly what I knew. In this particular case the wrongly accused had no alibi (not fake and not clammed up). If you think it might help I can mail it to you.


sxynsweet69
sxynsweet69

Mar-21-2004 10:00

I'm still doing the beginning level and I have found contradicting physical evidence but no other contradicting evidence. It could be that I just haven't run across any other contradicting evidence don't know yet since I haven't done that much

cfm
cfm
Nomad

Sep-3-2008 16:25

Wow. To think we take for granted the formula we have today. It's all thanks to these guys.

*takes off hat and bows head in memorium while cheesy sappy music plays in the background*

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]