 |
|
help needed asap =/
|
luddvas
|
Apr-22-2005 17:03
im on a case at the moment, and i found a bloody footprint from a heavy person. it finds out that there is only one heavy person in the case, and she has an alibi, and the shoemaker has identified that there is her footprint.
my q is, can i or can i not accuse her?
im pretty stuck, and my guess is that i cant acuse her. im i right or wrong?
|
| Replies |
Awling
|
Apr-23-2005 06:54
The last case I had, I found that someone that the townies had identified as a witness, had left physical evidence at the scene.
Of course, that's only one case, but I'm going to check with any spare questions in the next few cases that I have.
|
V Buster
Old Shoe
|
Apr-26-2005 00:24
I have checked this in a few cases, and sometimes they are and somtimes they are not. Also in the harder cases, there can be 4 pieces of evidence, but there are only two witnesses, so this theory cannot always work.
|
reda
Well-Connected
|
Apr-26-2005 02:53
I would'nt trust this. I strongly believe this is random.
|
|
|
