|
|
SHOULD PEOPLE BE EXCLUDED?
|
Angel_waiting_4_wings
|
Apr-17-2005 14:56
should people be excluded from hunts because they are new to an agency? if an agency shares the prize should the rookie also recieve prize?
|
Replies |
DaRu
Well-Connected
|
Apr-19-2005 22:00
I agree with jstkdn :)
|
Moonshh
Well-Connected
|
Apr-20-2005 00:29
Yup, and note Angel said they DON'T actually do it, she was just wondering...
|
ichiban
Well-Connected
|
Apr-20-2005 03:03
Well guess it doesn't really matter anymore *slamming the last of 5th of Old Crow* now does it!!!!! *breaking the bottle over my own head to state of unconciousness*
|
P. Rockwell
Well-Connected
|
Apr-20-2005 08:51
ouch!
Is there a Disgraced Doctor in the house?!?
|
elvenwonder
|
Apr-20-2005 12:00
I agree that internal policies are up to each agency, however I do like seeing an open discussion about it, if only so newbies can be better informed about the rules of an agency before they join. It can create such hard feelings in the community when a newbie doesn't know what questions to ask, and then feels they made a mistake after accepting a job offer and leaves.
As a newbie I would never have thought to ask if I was expected to contribute toward rent, how soon I would be promoted and allowed to use the locker, if I would be expected to drop certain favors, etc.
|
Lady Grey
|
Apr-21-2005 11:24
A answer would be for directors and officers recruiting to post the agency rules in the advertisment. That way everything is open and above board, and no-one can claim they didn't know what they were getting in to.
|
Meglet
|
Apr-28-2005 11:38
I never even thought about an agency splitting the prize...to me it seems like it's your duty to help with hunts to win the agency money which is in a way helping with the rent...right?
|
|