 |
|
proof of guilt
|
tdb
|
Feb-7-2005 14:46
if u need a bad or lack of alibi combined with one piece of PE for them to be guilty, then what is the point of finding out if one character saw another "leaving the scene of the crime" or "with bloody hands"?
|
| Replies |
Arne
Old Shoe
|
Feb-8-2005 12:06
Suspect evidence is very useful if your key suspect has clammed up before you found out what their alibi is. Getting two suspect evidences against them is really the only way to be sure they are guilty if you don't have any way to check their alibi.
Physical evidence even with ONE suspect evidence is not always enough, since there will be one witness who is wrong and two who are right in every case. And all the pieces of physical evidence belong to somebody - but only one belongs to someone with a fake alibi.
|
Matt Black
|
Feb-8-2005 12:28
I just had a wonderful example of this. I had one piece of suspect evidence and one piece of physical evidence against Leonard, and headed over to accuse him. Imagine my surprise when I found him dead! I had not been able to determine his alibi...
Thanks to this "thread" (ooh, a pun!), I was able to deduce the murderer - thanks people!
|
tdb
|
Feb-8-2005 12:31
This is very useful info. I hope lots of newbies see it.
|
tdb
|
Feb-8-2005 12:56
I used to try to get all 3: bad alibi, Pe and witness now it's MUCH easier. Thanks a lot guys :)
|
|
|
