Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Message Board Game Room


0 0
The Resistance: Lurker Edition
  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

The Announcer
The Announcer

Jul-1-2017 09:19

Hello everyone. I’ll be hosting another game of Resistance, and I encourage all lurkers from the previous game(s) to come out and play! We’ll keep it simple with just gameplay and no story this time. And if you’ve never played before, feel free to jump right in, because we all need more imaginary problems to worry about. :)

The game takes place over a series of 5 "missions." The Resistance is trying to complete 3 missions successfully, while the spies are attempting to sabotage 3 missions. First one to 3 wins.

I will serve as game master. Once we get enough people to play (5-10 total), I will PM everyone their allegiance (either "Resistance" or "Spy"). If you are a "Spy," I will also PM you the names of your co-conspirators.

A "leader" will be chosen at random for the first mission. The leader has 2 important functions:
1) The leader will assign various "role" abilities to players. These are one-shot special powers a player can use to learn more information about someone.
2) The leader will assign players to the "team" for that mission.

Missions will have a varying number of players who are selected; the leader picks a team, then every player will vote on whether or not they approve the team by PMing me. Once all the votes are cast, I will post the voting results. If a majority approves the team, the mission starts. If not, the mission does not start, and the next player in line becomes the new "leader" for that round. This continues until either a mission is approved, or 5 consecutive mission teams are rejected (in which case the spies win automatically.)

Once a mission team is approved, those players will PM me their choice of action during that mission. Resistance players will ALWAYS choose to have the mission succeed by sending "Success," while spies have a choice: they can either elect to have the mission succeed (to throw off suspicion), or they can "Sabotage" the mission.

Replies

Zara Bande
Zara Bande
Bounty Hunter

Jul-21-2017 14:38

Question for shell: any particular reason(s) for your selections?

Question for Sal: if absolutely no-one were here to advise you, what would your team selection be?

Rhetorical question: why do these last 3 posts from Sal, Bela and shell sound like across-the-table-talk between spies?

miss snopes
miss snopes
Demon of the Due Date

Jul-21-2017 15:38

The sabotaged vote was cast by either: Ty, Bela or Shell (If Sal lied about Shell's vote). That said, the 2nd team you proposed Shell I am 100% against. (Ty, Sal, Bela, Sindy) I don't see how we could gather anything new from that one.

Actual missions that went through:

M1, T2 - Ty - SUCCEED
Sindy - SUCCEED
Aspen - SUCCEED
(Was the first one so that doesn't mean there isn't a spy on it)

M2, T3 - Sal - SUCCEED
Shell - Succeed (Maybe)
Ty - ????????? (Maybe sabotage)
Bela - ????????? (Maybe sabotage)

We learned very little from these 2 missions. I am talking to the 4 other Resistance players here: What team will help us learn something?

Tyranomaster3
Tyranomaster3
Bloodhound

Jul-21-2017 18:37

My thanks to you, sindy, Bela, and shell, for your wishes.

Anyway, things are going to be confusing here. I think we should go step by step in picking a team. Let's see.

1st, Sal and shell must be on team because they had a link to each other by the confirmation of sal.

Sultry De Mon
Sultry De Mon
Con Artist

This reply has been deleted by a Moderator

Sal Iva
Sal Iva
Little Monster

Jul-21-2017 19:15

Right now, I'm trying to take everyone's ideas into consideration. It's a hard decision and I will have to make it soon, but I'm hoping to still hear from everyone or nearly everyone.

Answers for Zara:

Obviously I can't answer the question for shell.

As far as the question for me, I'd like to see a new face on a team. Neither you nor Missy have had a chance yet and I'd like to see one of those two on the team. Other than that, I see several selections (thanks everyone who has suggested something) that look like they could be good also. Sindy's looks good and so do Ty's as does shell's modifications of those teams.

Answer to the rhetorical question: The game has made you paranoid.

shell marple
shell marple
Con Artist

Jul-21-2017 19:21

Oops, posted in the wrong skin again and posted only half of what I wanted to say.

So I shall try again.

@ Zara, for my change to Sindy's team I choose Sal for the reason Ty stated above. I chose to remove Ty because I feel he is most resistance. I think Sindy is too, and am not sure about Aspen one way or another. But if mission one was a true team of all Resistance, this mission should succeed.

For Ty's team I removed myself and put Sindy in my place. Mainly because I did not want Bela,Sal, Aspen to be all together on the same team. I stayed away from you and Missy because I thought this team might expose one spy. Adding either of you in adds a wild card into the scenerio.

I'm not one of these people who feel the only good team is one that is all resistance. Next two rounds we need to have 5 members. It is only going to get harder to exclude spys. If we can out one here, then mission 4s team selections might be easier.

miss snopes
miss snopes
Demon of the Due Date

Jul-21-2017 19:45

Shell: Did you mean to make this statement: "I chose to remove Ty because I feel he is most resistance."?

Bela Talbot III
Bela Talbot III
Con Artist

Jul-22-2017 00:50

Aaargh, I don't know any more; for my final pick I'm sticking with my suggestion of (Sal, Aspen, Missy, Bela). I guess I'm going to be sitting around twiddling my thumbs till OC or OPEN UP is out. :/

Bela Talbot III
Bela Talbot III
Con Artist

Jul-22-2017 01:01

There's a version of this game without any power cards too. Eep! XD

Again, I'm totally volunteering to be offered OC/OPEN UP or have it used on me. It'll make M2 results that much clearer, but I should learn something if you shy away from using it on me too. :D

Zara Bande
Zara Bande
Bounty Hunter

Jul-22-2017 01:52

Thanks to shell and Sal for clarifying things. And lol Sal, okay - but let’s not pretend that it doesn’t happen ; )

I find myself agreeing with shell in regard to Ty and Sindy. I’ve also re-read much of the ‘case’ against Aspen and think it may well be a red herring, as Sindy suggested at one point. I feel that, overall, the reasons given by shell are pretty convincing and would be willing to support her suggestion of: Sal, Sindy, Aspen and shell.

  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

[ You must login to reply ]