I'm working on a very hard case (not exactly newbie but I'm new to very hard cases aha) I have a suspect with not alibi that suspects someone(not sure who clammed before I fund out but has to be someone with an alibi) and then I have another person who doesn't have an alibi that suspects the person that suspects someone. I had this issue before and went after the one who was in the position of the first suspect I mentioned. Yet it ended up being wrong. If there any rule of thumb for this or is it just a guess? One more peice of information, the evidence I found matches noone without an alibi. So it is compleatly dependent on what the suspects say.