|
|
Stuck
|
pandapan
|
Jul-13-2016 07:26
I'm working on a very hard case (not exactly newbie but I'm new to very hard cases aha) I have a suspect with not alibi that suspects someone(not sure who clammed before I fund out but has to be someone with an alibi) and then I have another person who doesn't have an alibi that suspects the person that suspects someone. I had this issue before and went after the one who was in the position of the first suspect I mentioned. Yet it ended up being wrong. If there any rule of thumb for this or is it just a guess? One more peice of information, the evidence I found matches noone without an alibi. So it is compleatly dependent on what the suspects say.
|
Replies |
Autumnsprings
Con Artist
|
Jul-13-2016 11:03
That last bit should read
*******Remember*******
PE + WE doesn't mean anything. The person could be guilty or not, but that is not enough to safely accuse someone.
Sorry for adding to the confusion. :/
|
Lady Jas
The Chosen One
|
Jul-13-2016 17:41
Also a clammed alibi is not the same as "no alibi"..
|
Autumnsprings
Con Artist
|
Jul-13-2016 19:23
True clammed is when you get
"At that, he clammed up quick.
He'd had enough of my questions, unless there was something I could do to convince him to be more cooperative."
|
|