 |
|
|
One more Q - accusing
|
Tamiram
|
Jan-3-2010 07:32
I just read the Newbies FAQ (great work guys, really).
I remembered that in the past I would've needed 2 witness evidence to get a conviction.
In the Newbies FAQ it actually says that if I get a physical/witness evidence against somebody without/false alibi, it's enough for me to get a conviction. Is this correct?
|
| Replies |
Elizabeth Christie
Tireless Tiger
|
Jan-3-2010 08:09
Yep, that's correct. You only need 2 witness evidence if you don't know whether or not the suspect has a fake/no alibi (i.e. the suspect has clammed before you got their alibi).
|
Tamiram
|
Jan-3-2010 09:33
OK, and if the suspect has a fake/no alibi I need just one evidence?
|
Max Abshire
|
Jan-3-2010 19:53
Yeah, and it can either be physical evidence or hearsay witness.
|
Tamiram
|
Jan-4-2010 05:13
Wow, I didn't know that the first time around.
Really shortens the cases instead of investigating all of the suspects.
|
|
|
