 |
|
|
evidence
|
iknowit
|
May-14-2004 08:48
Can two or more evidences belong to the same suspect? or each evidence will ALWAYS belong to a different suspect?
|
| Replies |
Ellie Etnes
|
May-14-2004 15:43
As far as I can tell there are always at least two pieces evidence pointing to the right suspect as a fail safe in case access is blocked to one of the pieces of evidence. It is very likely for witnesses or suspects with the right evidence to clam up or be killed.
|
kouraditsa
|
May-14-2004 16:00
If you are refering to physical evidence, then I can say I have never seen a case with two physical pointing to the same person.
But, in hard cases, there are two witnesses pointing to the same person.
|
The Rogue
|
May-14-2004 16:14
Exactly. In the hard case, you usually narrow it down to two main people with the physical evidence, and after that question the suspects about these people, and you'll usually soon have enough evidence to point the way.
|
Kitten
|
May-14-2004 17:44
Counting both physical and verbal evidence together, there will ALWAYS be at least two pieces of evidence pointing to the killer - verbal alone is at least two.
I believe also innocent suspects can have more than one piece of evidence pointing towards them. They will of course have a valid alibi, though.
|
iknowit
|
May-14-2004 20:43
I see. So in conclusion, each physical evidence should only point to one suspect (eg. hair, footprint, thread, and threatening note), correct?
|
kouraditsa
|
May-14-2004 22:23
I don't really know this for a fact, but I can say that this has been my experience so far.
|
Celina
|
May-22-2004 12:33
I once had a case in which the guilty suspect had left a print, a thread and a note... that was pretty easy to solve
|
kouraditsa
|
May-22-2004 18:34
You mean 3 physical pointing to the same person? wow! Never happened to me...
|
inspector
|
May-24-2004 08:53
Hurmph! Up at the Yard, we rountinely endeavor to account for All of the evidence. But, just the mark of the "true professional", I suppose...
|
|
|
