|
|
Can I accuse someone base on deduction?
|
Dan Morihiko
|
Aug-22-2007 10:08
This may sound stupid, but i really want to know if i can accuse someone by deduction?
Like, I have 3 suspects with no/fake alibi left. (Let's say person A, B, C)
I then try matching first PE with A and B, both not match. But I already bribed when match 1st with B, so C is left unmatched.
Same goes with another PE and all WE, But I'm so damn sure that C is guilty. Even when the case find didn't show matched PE and none WE.
Can I accuse suspect C base on this?
|
Replies |
Dan Morihiko
|
Aug-23-2007 05:40
Thanks folk.
What I ask is about the time that I'm really really 99.9% sure about the guilty one. All I ask is do i need the game to confirm the evident first, or i could go without it.
So I guess this is a 'Yes'.
|
Arabella Parker
Well-Connected
|
Aug-23-2007 08:04
Correct Dan, you do not need to uncover any evidence for the game to allow you accuse. You could in theory, open a case, accuse the first person without asking a single question or checking the crime scene. Though that would not be very wise.
|
Jay Rain
|
Aug-24-2007 22:57
I do not bother asking for an alibi when I know that the person has no way of having a PE in the crime scene. If I find clues like 'curly hair' and 'heavy person', I won't ask the suspect for alibi if he/she has straight hair and is a slim person.
However, as I have painfully found out yesterday, being less than 100% sure is quite the frustrating experience. Especially if you make Shady really rich. =(
Any way to frame Shady for a crime? =D
|
|