Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Newbie Questions


0 0
The Science of Murder
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

henryc
henryc
Old Shoe

Jul-29-2007 14:27

Is this featured mystery badly mis-rated as being of intermediate difficulty? I attempted it because it was one of the easier one listed. I realize that the rating standard is different for the featured mysteries than for the random ones. My question is how this is rated in relation to the other featured mysteries.

I was able to determine who the murderer was after multiple false accusations. However, I have found no logical basis for accusing the murderer even after attempting the mystery several additional times. In my attempts I have encountered evidence and alibis which apparently can't be checked out, a twist which in some attempts does not appear, a suspect supplying their own motive (which does not register on the case file for that suspect), even a curly handed suspect. I believe I have uncovered all of the evidence, everyone has answered all of the questions supplied. If I missed something, it must have been because the sequence in which I did things blocks me from obtaining additional information. If that is the case, I haven't seen anything which would indicate that a particular sequence should be followed. Any hints, or should I just accept that featured mysteries are based more on guesswork than logic?

Replies

Lady Emerald Devon
Lady Emerald Devon
Nomad

Aug-3-2007 03:56

Yeah, I think you're fighting a losing battle with that one Henry. I enjoyed it but I was like, well... ok... :)

Try the Unread Will one, it's good.


  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]