|
|
which skill is better ???
|
agent-1
|
Oct-20-2006 01:38
|
Replies |
agent-1
|
Oct-20-2006 17:33
ok u have your point but there r some questions u dont have to ask coz some questions r useless and some r little risky not to ask , so im very careful about questions i ask this way i have the answers i need ofcourse not all the time but nearly most times , this way helps me solving hard level cases .
|
AndreaX
Thespian
|
Oct-20-2006 17:43
Um..yes..ok..agent-1...
Good luck!
|
nicnic
Battered Shoe
|
Oct-20-2006 22:22
Personally, I couldn't live without stress detection so I know when a suspect is about to clam on me and it helps you know who you ask more questions versus others. I wouldn't worry about hypnotism yet. I still don't have it (even though it would be nice) it's not necessary. If you want to start working on harder cases, definitely beef up your interview and smart skills.
|
reda
Well-Connected
|
Oct-21-2006 03:30
I would suggest to go with the interview skills first, then the rest of smart and only later the faction skills.
|
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer
|
Oct-21-2006 04:05
Am I reading that list wrong? Get research!!
don't bother with the tough skills for now, you're not tough.
Research > flirting (quick cheap pick-up) > Intermediate rule bending and inter sweet talking > advanced evidence skills > advanced rule bending & sweet talking > stress detection / judge of character > hypnotism > tough skills.
|
R Anstett
|
Oct-21-2006 07:29
I will agree with SS here after he points out that my glasses must be very dirty to have missed that.
Research is a skill that every detective should have to start.
It totally eliminates one suspect so you do not have to ask any questions of that person.
|
Eddy H.
|
Oct-21-2006 15:06
theres no use of having sweet talking and interrogation if u dnt have judge of character agent-1 , its like they cancel each other , it might be obvious that for women u should use sweet talking and interrogation for men , but i have those 3 skills ( intemediate interrogation, sweet talking, and judge of character) and it proves that theory wrong sometimes , so if ur not gonna get the judge of character skill , then i suggest that u concentrate either on toughness or on charm , in my opinion , the crime seen isnt that important , its enuf to get witness evidence with a fake alibi and uve found the killer
but i really dnt know if u find out to whom the footprint or handwriting or hair or watever belong , and this person has a fake alibi, if u are able to accuse him , and thats my question if someone can answer me :)
|
R Anstett
|
Oct-21-2006 15:11
Eddy:
Liar/no alibi + PE = guilty
Liar/no alibi + WE = guilty
WE + WE = guilty
PE = physical evidence such as foot prints
WE = witness evidence
|
Eddy H.
|
Oct-21-2006 15:16
so its quite correct to say that the crime scene is not as important as having tough skills and sharm skills
|
Eddy H.
|
Oct-21-2006 15:21
charm* sorry , btw , i had a detective b4 this one , and i had concentrated on toughness , advanced intimidation and advanced interrogation , and my interrogation adjustment from buying stuff was 5 , and still there are some that clam and stay clammed after trying to convince them to be more cooperative , wat if i had physical evidence on this person , wat do i do to make sure that hes the killer or not ??? , and can i really have 2 witness evidences on 1 person from 2 different people ?
|
|