kouraditsa
|
Apr-21-2004 16:05
There is something I don't quite understand:
As far as I know, we say that there will always be at least 2 pieces of evidence pointing to the guilty suspect. This means that there will always be 1 physical evidence pointing to the murderer (I never came across 0 or 2). In that case, the less physical evidence the easier to solve the case (you have less things to check).
And also, I assume that the more smarts you have, the bigger the chance to spot more physical evidence. Since you never have multiple physical evidence point to the quilty suspect, why would you want to have more smarts?
|
