Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
physical evidence and smarts
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

kouraditsa
kouraditsa

Apr-21-2004 16:05

There is something I don't quite understand:
As far as I know, we say that there will always be at least 2 pieces of evidence pointing to the guilty suspect. This means that there will always be 1 physical evidence pointing to the murderer (I never came across 0 or 2). In that case, the less physical evidence the easier to solve the case (you have less things to check).
And also, I assume that the more smarts you have, the bigger the chance to spot more physical evidence. Since you never have multiple physical evidence point to the quilty suspect, why would you want to have more smarts?

Replies

Kitten
Kitten

Apr-22-2004 05:02

I still quite regularly get cases without any physical evidence, and I'm doing very very hard with closer to 20 000 exp. It's quite common if you have no (or very few) smarts skills. Also, very often when I find one piece of physical it does not point to the guilty suspect.

Fat Chuck
Fat Chuck

Apr-22-2004 06:39

I have enough smarts skills that I always find all of the physical evidence (3 except incredibly hard, where it is 4). Always one and only one points to the right suspect. Always the others owning the evidence will have alibis. In a case I picked up in our case files there were only two pieces of evidence. Both owners had alibis. There was no DETECTED physical evidence pointing to the right suspect. That's not to say it didn't exist. If the original investigator had been a little smarter, they would have found the one more necessary bit.

Flashman
Flashman

Apr-24-2004 19:34

It would be handy if, as you work for the same agency, you could re-investigate the scene and find evidence missed by your colleague.

It's an idea, but probably in the wrong place to post.

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]