Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
Treasure Hunt Suggestion
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

Lukey Mcsleuth
Lukey Mcsleuth

Aug-20-2004 10:09

Have had a thought about the treasure hunt situation. I thought a good idea would be to set up different levels of treasure hunts. Similar to how the cases work. Only agencys of (for example) less than 5000 fame can search for certain treasure..then agencys with 5000 - 10000 fame can search for other treasures...etc... This way the agencies who are of similar ability/time period will be against each other for the treasure hunts and make things more fair.
You could even arrange it a different way so that say all agencies with less than 10 treasure go for the same treasures..then more then 10 etc...
The treasures could be worth more for the more experienced agencies and more fame could be given for them, like with the case files...what are people's thoughts...

Replies

Elsey
Elsey

Aug-30-2004 14:47

if there is a favor needed for 2 hunts, it goes to the top one on the list...

jstkdn
jstkdn
Well-Connected

Aug-30-2004 16:13

I personally don't like the idea. Winning a treasure hunt is not harder or easier for a new agency vs old agency. People with lower experience, get easier favours.

Let the example be demons deed. We have been in the top 10 since forever, and look how we suck at treasure hunts?

It is a matter of time, same time online, and coordination. Not so much experience in my opinion.

Dogberta
Dogberta
Nomad

Aug-30-2004 19:07

Winning a favor is no harder for new folks than seasoned sleuths, but winning a hunt is a lot harder for a small agency than a big one. It would be nice to have something that was either for small agencies only, or you could combine forces - like a Dream Team.

Moonshh
Moonshh
Well-Connected

Aug-31-2004 06:17

Moving this up past the spam from haza.

jstkdn
jstkdn
Well-Connected

Aug-31-2004 10:53

Yes but the thing is having 12 agents in an agency or 3 doesn't say anything either. We have had 12 agents, but 4 actively playing.

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]