|
|
What's the best strategy?
|
Hiram
|
Feb-16-2006 10:53
What's the best order to do things in? I usually question subjects for aliby and who they suspect, then check alibys 'til I know everyone who's lying and not. Then I check out all the physical evidence until the PE guys clam (which is usually right away) then I ask the suspects who they suspect, going down the line asking only about people who I know are lying about their alibys. Is there a better way to do this? What are some other strategies?
|
Replies |
reda
Well-Connected
|
Feb-21-2006 02:37
Yeah this thread deffinatly exist somewhere. I remember it too. So we just need to wait till we get a way to search threads. Or till someone is crazy enough to go threw all of Fat Chuck's posts LOL
|
Greyling
|
Feb-21-2006 02:48
Well, technically it should be the last post he made since it was a kind of his swan song - however, after a quick check it turns out to be the 3rd to last, topic "what to do?" ;)
|
Arabesque
Old Shoe
|
Feb-21-2006 19:07
Just defending my officer here--he retired himself as he was unhappy with his skills combo. His name now is hiram2 and he's feeling much better now lol.
|
Dr. Falco Maltese
Well-Connected
|
Feb-22-2006 20:03
Peter, I have never had any physical evidence match up with the person who is cleared by research. I don't think it can happen.
|
reda
Well-Connected
|
Feb-23-2006 04:29
Nope it cant. Im sure Ben said it somewhere when the research skill came out.
|
|