|
|
Dodgy Evidence
|
morrison
|
Aug-4-2004 04:57
I,m new at this but have just completed the meandering mystery of the family crime and have been told that the suspect whom I correctly identified did not match up with the evidence.
Is anaylisis on scene of crime often incorrect?
|
Replies |
Fonzie
|
Aug-4-2004 11:08
you can never have more then four pieces of evidence at the crime scene, first of all, and sir james is right, the killer will always leave a piece of evidence at the crime scene, so it's only useless if you dont have the proper skills to find that evidence, there's always two ways to solve a case, through physical evidence, or witness evidence. oh, btw, did you check those alibis? just because they have one doesnt make it real
|
Sir James
|
Aug-4-2004 17:06
Although I don't rightfully know what LMAO and ASAP mean, (ok I DO know what ASAP means, but LMAO remains a mystery) the speach of Anonymous (and such a charming name at that) has left an impression...
I simply have to reply...
But I won't, Fonzie has done it before me...
I AM sorry Anonymous, but I've never seen a case with 5 pieces of physical evidence.
(OMG I HAVE replied)
|
Dudgeon
|
Aug-4-2004 17:18
wow
|
Sir James
|
Aug-4-2004 17:37
What?
|
Vin Riddick
|
Aug-4-2004 20:33
LMAO is Laughing My A$$ Off and there is no more than 4 pieces and Physical Evidence is a part of Convicting. Physical Evidence is a MUST.
|
Bella Luna
|
Aug-4-2004 23:03
It may be wise Anonymous to take the advise of one who has more experience than your self, as in Sir James. He has no doubt played more cases and would I'm sure be giving you helpful advise.
|
Vin Riddick
|
Aug-5-2004 16:19
I so agree With Bella
|
Fonzie
|
Aug-7-2004 22:14
i guess i'll have to walk in sir james's shadow
|
Bella Luna
|
Aug-8-2004 05:00
I could'nt imagine you walking in any ones shadow Fonzie.
|
|