|
|
No PE but guilty?
|
Veto1024
|
Jul-14-2005 01:56
I had a weird case, there were 2 pieces of evidence and 3 suspects with non-real alibis. 1 piece of evidence was neither of the 3 suspect's hair. The next piece of evidence is a footprint. I find the person whos footprint it is. I then ask everyone if they think its that person and no one thinks it is. I think "well... this is the ONLY suspect with any PE" yet when i accuse, its a false accusation. It was one of the other suspects with non-real alibis! Can this happen? No physical evidence but hes guilty?
|
Replies |
V Buster
Old Shoe
|
Jul-15-2005 04:51
With only a +2 in smarts, chances are that you didn't find one of the pieces of PE at the crime scene.
|
AlwaysRight
|
Jul-17-2005 09:26
If someone has an alibi, does that mean that they are definitely not guilty?
|
AlwaysRight
|
Jul-17-2005 09:27
Presuming the alibi is real.
|
cfm
Nomad
|
Jul-17-2005 09:33
Yep. Real alibi means they could not have done it.
From the newbie FAQ link at the very bottom of the screen in in tiny grey letters...
3) How do I know which suspect is guilty?
You need to establish three things before you can prove a suspect guilty:
"The suspect must have a motive.
The suspect can either have no alibi, or the alibi they give must be proven false.
You must uncover a piece of physical or witness evidence implicating the suspect."
|
Mr.Smirnova
|
This reply has been deleted by a Moderator
|
|