sirgarr
|
Mar-5-2004 22:03
Does anybody ever *falsely* suspect someone based on specific evidence (blood, watch)?
Does any evidence at the crime scene ever *falsely* point to someone (an innocent person's hair)?
Trying to figure out if you only need one piece of evidence to accuse someone.
- It would be awesome if this weren't the case and that people would lie or there'd be complications about the crime scene built into the plot. "The innocent person's hair was there because she was there the night before." "Person X lied to you about suspecting person Y because of a personal agenda."
- But if not, it would be cool to know that there's only one piece of evidence needed to speed up how long it takes to solve a case.
|
