Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
Proposed solution to the writing limit dilemma
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

Autumnsprings
Autumnsprings
Con Artist

Aug-28-2016 07:10

So it looks like some of those who received PMs regarding the proposed fix haven't forwarded it to their teammates.
In the interest on everyone having the same information I'm sharing it here. Riza wants to know if we go through with this plan or handle it a different way. First, her message:

"So here's the plan. I'm going to survey all the teams. If at least 3 of them say they are willing to revise and resubmit their pieces, then we'll scrap the original entries and use the new ones. Except this time, there will be explicitly stated word limits and content guidelines. And I will be running it."


Here are my thoughts:

The proposed "fix" of a rewrite is no fix at all.
the contestants all put a LOT of work into their submissions. we shouldn't have to do that work over again, while trying to do this week's events as well.

Here's my suggestion:

Maybe those who were within the stated limit should be given the chance to submit their ORIGINAL entries (as long as it's under 5000 characters and those who went over shouldn't.

That way, the event would count so the work put into them wouldn't be disregarded.

Those who wrote according to the stated rules wouldn't have to do a complete rewrite. And those who went over wouldn't be penalized.

If three teams agree to Riza's suggestion, it will be implemented. If at least three teams do not vote yes, I hope they will implement my suggestion. It seems the most fair way to deal with this.

I am getting to get at play two teams to vote no.

Replies

Vulkie3
Vulkie3
Haynes

Aug-29-2016 12:45

One watermelon coming up then - I'll give the cherry flavored one to Autumn. Poor thing has been through so much lately, she deserves a free ice cream :)

Autumnsprings
Autumnsprings
Con Artist

Aug-31-2016 00:51

thank you vulkie! free ice cream is always yummier.

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]