Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Message Board Game Room

Jun-18-2012 11:08

Once again, turmoil is brewing in the underground crime world of New York. The city is slowly being taken over by La Cosa Nostra, the New York underground mafia. They are recruiting members at record numbers and they can be seen in every night club and bar scaring away customers. And now Joseph Hollis, the High Philosopher of the Order of Socrates, and mayor of New York, has learned of a secret plan by his rival faction, La Cosa Nostra, to go on a crime spree and make off with money, valuables, and ultimate control of various establishments in New York.

Mr. Hollis, being not only concerned with the livelihoods of the patrons of his city, but also with his rival faction gaining too much power, has decided to put together a team of trusted Order of Socrates resistance operatives to foil the plans of La Cosa Nostra. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of attrition lately, and certain people have been going to the highest bidder to offer their services as a spy working from within the Order of Socrates. Joseph is aware of this and he's put together the best possible team he can think of, but unwittingly will be inviting some spies for La Cosa Nostra to his team of operatives.

As long as the loyal Order of Socrates operatives can figure out whom amongst them is untrustworthy, their mission should be a success. But if they trust the wrong people, La Cosa Nostra will succeed and cause severe damage to the New York economy, while gaining enough power to take over the city.

Will the mayor and his team be able to restore order to New York? Or will the underground mafia, take over the city's resources? That's for you to decide in this version of The Resistance: Order of Socrates Restores Order

Jun-27-2012 09:49

No one is allowed to scheme in this game, remember?

Other people aren't posting yet because they aren't on. I'm sure when they get here, they will see the logic in my arguments.

This is merely a classic case of he said she said. All I'm saying is I didn't vote to sabotage. Serges lied. There's no reason for him to lie unless he's a spy. If he's a spy, you're a spy.

Itd be just like him to play the game this way. On the other hand, as much as you say my decisions don't make sense, they don't make sense if I'm a spy either. I'm equal opportunity stupid. ;)

Jun-27-2012 09:57

Logic? You have none in your arguments and that has been the very reason I started asking you questions and saying that you are a spy.

Serges never lied. You sabotaged the game and before you there have NEVER been 2 sabotages in the teams we were in.

And by we , I intend to mean Serges, Illicit and I.

They make a lot of sense when you are a spy. It's just that you overlooked the better chance of winning you had. But it makes sense trying to stay unidentified.

Jun-27-2012 10:00

Don't try to rope poor Illicit in with you. Unless she's a spy as well, of course.

If I'm so smart, how would I overlook the chance at winning? Also, if I'm so smart, why wouldn't I have sabotaged any other missions I've been on??

You SAY Serges never lied. I say he did. This was the only mission that NEEDED two saboteurs, so of course you both had to sabotage this time. There'd be no reason for two in any other round.

Jun-27-2012 10:00

I think you don't have to communicate one another to figure out getting one spy in a team will do except for the last mission :)

Jun-27-2012 10:01

Which basically just proves your a spy. Why would you even be thinking that way unless you were??

Jun-27-2012 10:07

And further, if that's the case, how come the spies are LOSING?

Jun-27-2012 10:09

I have never commented on how smart you are; I said I didn't take you seriously when you tried to fool people with the "stupid and innocent" card. You are trying to digress from the main point by demagogy.

Biggie you tried to stay unidentified. That's the reason you voted "succeed" before. If you think I'm going to give up repeating that, you are wrong :)

We would win the game already if Serges and I were spies: But we'd have to get others on team to stay unknown.

I hope you can answer that one day (two spies deliberately in a game since mission 1 ). I said the same thing days ago, you said I was right because it was too logical an argument to be defetated and now that you think it's all over and people have forgotten it, you try to avoid it and keep accusing us being spies because you know you have no show to put up anymore other than this little bit of social engineering you've been up to :)

2 saboteurs, exactly just when marc and you were in the same team and not before, when Serges and I and Illicit were in it multiple times.

Jun-27-2012 10:13

lol biggie a normal person is capable of what I am doing: thinking as if they were in others' shoes. That's cheap now, lol.

She actually said tha I was a spy because I mentioned what a spy could do at the beginning of a game. lol

Jun-27-2012 10:16

"We would win the game already if Serges and I were spies: But we'd have to get others on team to stay unknown."

No you wouldn't, because you would have given yourself away before. By continually trying to solidify your position as resistance, you gave yourself the cover needed to blow two missions in a row. You're just praying everyone believes you.

I DID say you were right, in the beginning, because that's exactly what you guys wanted me to think. And as I've said, all the way up to this mission, I believed you. And that makes me naive.

Well, I don't believe you now. As soon as nic sends me the card, I will KNOW for sure. And its already pretty obvious that out of all the people on that team, for two to blow it, either me and Marc or you and Serges have to be spies. And since I KNOW I'm not, it means by default that you guys must be. And that's not even factoring the blatant lie told by Serges.

Saying I'm responsible for social engineering is giving me a TON of credit I don't deserve.

Jun-27-2012 10:18

As I suspected, I just received Serges' vote and it was for SABOTAGE.

Your plans have been foiled, my friends :p