Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
Question About Clams
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

Synesence
Synesence
Vigilante

Oct-23-2011 09:45

I'd just like to know, what determines the outcome of whether a suspect is going to be cooperative with you or shut the door on your face?

As in, is it the difference in percentage between Sweet Talking and Toughness or whichever method has the highest percentage that determines unclamming a suspect? Cause I've had times where I've used Sweet Talking on suspects who favor it only to have them clam on me instead. Is there some mechanic here I'm not familiar with?

Replies

Secret_Squirrel
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer

Oct-24-2011 16:31

playing naked is NOT 'an additional factor' Cordy!

Peter O'Neil
Peter O'Neil
Old Shoe

Oct-25-2011 10:26

But it could prove enlightening.

I. M. Special II
I. M. Special II

Oct-25-2011 15:49

I find solving cases while eating clam chowder has an effect.

Secret_Squirrel
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer

Oct-26-2011 02:23

mmm being stuck in Cair for a week has the same outcome.

Cordelia Falco
Cordelia Falco
Battered Shoe

Oct-26-2011 06:38

Shucks, SS, you guessed...

Synesence
Synesence
Vigilante

Oct-27-2011 03:33

I thought removing the 'Enter' Button on your keyboard boosts the stats right up. Seriously, any other useful theories? :(

Cordelia Falco
Cordelia Falco
Battered Shoe

Oct-31-2011 00:30

Honestly? No. No real theories. It's just down to the numbers.

Suspects don't 'favour' sweet talking over intimidation, not really. They just have a likelihood of responding to each, represented by the numbers you see if you use JoC, and one number will be higher than the other. You're still talking probabilities. The two probabilities do not affect each other.

My take on the numbers themselves is that if it's over 100 you're guaranteed they'll answer at least one question, but then the probability is reduced for the next one. If the initial number is less than 100 then there's a chance they might clam straight away.

If anyone has any evidence of a suspect with 100 or more not answering even one question, that would be useful to know!

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]