Sleuth Home - Message Boards - Sleuth Talk


0 0
Money Sink Ideas
  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

Jesse Hunter
Jesse Hunter
Bibliophile

Dec-6-2007 17:08

It has been brought up before that without ways to remove cash from circulation any game economy is in long term trouble. Sleuth currently has at least five such money sinks available to all subscribed players:
Travel Costs
Bribes
Detective/Faction Shops
Real Estate
Shady Character

Travel and Bribes function well. Shops incur mostly one time expenses from low to mid experience characters. Real Estate (with the exception of Agency Rent) incurs a one time expense from mid to high experience characters. Shady really seems to be the biggest money sink of the game, and is really the reason for this thread. Having said that...

THIS IS NOT A THREAD ABOUT ALTERING THE SHADY SYSTEM!
(see "Beating a Dead Horse" if that's your thing, there are also other threads for non-money related ideas)

It's just that the money sink function of Shady is a big justification for keeping the current system. If we can come up with some new money sinks, maybe we can make some progress on that other front.

I'm looking for ideas that won't significantly change gameplay or create unbalance in the game. Ideas that appeal to all high experience detectives (not just the ones with FAs) and agencies are best, cause that's where the money is.

Replies

Breitkat
Breitkat
Pinball Amateur

Dec-8-2007 19:19

I'm glad you're able to save up money so quickly, Ran. Unfortunately, I don't think most people on Sleuth are as lucky with their earning potential as you are.

Yes, there should be an expensive price to be paid for changing a contact. But is it REALLY as vital to Sleuth's overall welfare as a false accusation? (Ie--Is erasing a false accusation worth as much as changing a contact?) In my opinion, the answer is no. To me, there's a huge difference between the two. And to me, it's not worth spending every cent I'll earn for four months just to change one contact.

Jesse Hunter
Jesse Hunter
Bibliophile

Dec-8-2007 22:07

My earnings are about the same as Ran's, and since I started helping on the treasure hunts I've been doing mostly hard or lower cases.

Anyone who wants to dump all their contacts by falsing out is welcome to continue to do so. I hear there'll come a time when extra skill points are abundant, but personally I can't take that hit now. Also, since I'm careful to always follow the formula of guilt, to ME it's worth much much more to dump a bad contact than to erase a FA.

As for the graded system, the good thing about it is that it allows the same service to be fairly offered to all skill levels. The specific problem with Shady isn't the system, it's that the formula used to calculate prices is whacked. Look at the table above and think back two years or so to when you only had 50 or 100 cases under your belt. $2x,000 might as well have been a million, but you could get there. A flat fee at that level is completely beyond reach. You'll also notice that even the highest fee I gave (based on four years of hard sleuthing) is nowhere near the outrageous prices shady would want for a detective of that level.

Some people may not find it worthwhile, but there's been enough posts about changing or dropping contacts that I'd bet more than a few people would be glad for some other option than total contact annihilation.

roamie
roamie
Well-Connected

Dec-9-2007 05:55

I dont think anyone should be retiring detectives just to change contacts OR to get out of paying Shady. In my opinion , the retirement feature should only be used when someone ACCIDENTALLY gets three FAs and loses their detective.

I know you dont care about statistics and such Ran, but quite a few of us have put in alot of time on this game and are proud of our experience rating. And now we can always go shoe shopping and use all those extra skill points!!

I hope newer players who read these posts dont think of retirement as an easy out option for any reason.

Secret_Squirrel
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer

Dec-9-2007 15:50

lol *chuckles* loves the whole 'Ran doesn't care about statistics' comment... did I wake up in an alternate reality?! :s

Now where was I. OK. Yes I like the idea of paying to get new contacts.

Just cap the thing if people insist on a sliding scale.

I do think an increasing cost is a good thing though. It might just be as easy to charge $150,000 for the first contact (not the first time you change 'that' contact) you change, $250,000 for the second and cap it at $400,000 for every subsequent contact.

I find that usually players complain about the one contact they would like to change, rather than x amount of contacts. This makes it cost effective to get rid of that one contact, and then players who need to change again for their Agency - well the Agency should be paying for that if they want you to change it - so it should be relatively cheap for the Agency as well.

As a softener to that idea above it could be city based. So that it becomes a kind of 'reputation' thing. So whilst it might cost you $400,000 to change your third - X contact in New York, it'll only cost you $150,00 to change your first in London.

Anyway I like the original idea and don't mean to cloud the issue.

Secret_Squirrel
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer

Dec-9-2007 16:00

PS I DO think retirement is a legitimate option (and have considered Ran's 'dump gear & $'s and then false out' option many times) only because it IS part of the game play and as such can be used however you want to use it, until someone who makes the rules says, no you can't use it that way. I think - and I'm not trying to be inflammatory - many of us have fallen into the trap before of telling players what we think is right or wrong based on what we perceive to be right or wrong, rather than what the game has a capacity to let us do, or not. And that has always well... sucked.

roamie
roamie
Well-Connected

Dec-10-2007 08:42

Well I dont believe I ever said the retirement issue wasnt allowed nor did I tell people what to do. Hence the words IN MY OPINION. If older agents who have been around awhile want to take the easy way out and use it, thats fine. But my fear is newer players will see it as an easy out option without understanding the ramifications of their actions. And I dont think it should be thrown out there as an option when discussing issues as alot of us dont want to have to retire our detectives just to change contacts or pay off shady.

**DISCLAIMER** The above mentioned comments are solely the Opinion of the writer. They are in no way trying to tell someone what to or advise of what is legal and or illegal in the game of sleuth.

P.S. You know what they say about opinions. ;-)

biggie528
biggie528
Lucky Stiff

Dec-10-2007 12:45

*raises her hand and waves it around* I do roamie! :)

in *my* opinion (which I know everyone loves hearing), this is not even worth arguing cuz its not ever something I would consider. I like the permanence of contacts (especially the ones I quit a considerable amount of favors to get), so I will be keeping mine, thank you.

And I'm of the same opinion that I, personally, would never use retirement as part of my game strategy. I've worked too hard to get the experience I have to throw it away cuz I want new contacts.



Jesse Hunter
Jesse Hunter
Bibliophile

Dec-10-2007 13:53

I know I've been pushing the idea pretty hard, but I must confess that the only times I would want to drop a contact is if I switched agencies (and I like where I'm at), if my agency switched cities (and we found that our contacts clash), or if I pick up a bad contact in an overzealous pursuit of a lost treasure. So what's my motive? I brought it up because I noticed it has been a pretty constant complaint throughout the history of the message boards, and I think it'd add to the game.

I can also see where one would want to dump a contact they picked up before joining an agency, in their early days of sleuthing. That's why I'm a bigger fan of the scale idea (handled properly), since it makes the service expensive, but still assessable to relative newbies (like me) who might want the option.

Regardless, I know I DON'T want to false out. The other consequences are too great for me to handle.

Secret_Squirrel
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer

Dec-10-2007 15:11

Yeah you're right roamie. I apologise. I just obviously read more into something than there was there. I usually read your 'opinion' with interest, and even amusement, rather than skepticism, so as the youngsters say 'my bad'.

I think the only point I should have made, was, rightly or wrongly :) falsing outfor new contacts is an option. Not a pretty one, not one the feature was designed for, but one that is a legitimate game play option.

Whether players, old or new, take it up is of course completely and utterly up to them.

Newer players can already see that some older players are for it and some against it, and that either / either, no-one would be criticised for using it.

Now sorry Jesse... changing a contact... great idea lol

Bela Talbot III
Bela Talbot III
Con Artist

May-11-2014 09:48

Some ideas already on the boards, on how to dump a contact, the first three, I'd love to see implemented:

At the end of every VH, if the co-conspirator is one of your contacts, you have the option of dumping that contact (can you trust them any more, after they've been harbouring the very villain you're after while you go traipsing around the city trying to find that villain?! You'd thought that contact was your friend! (a little bit melodramatic, but hey, betrayal generally is). This makes the choosing random enough, and you'll have to wait a bit, just as you wait for a favour for a townie you'd like as a contact; you could even include a big enough fee (so that people don't make a habit out of it) as a "good-bye and thanks for everything", and after that you'd have to go contact-hunting as usual. (ctown and Anikka)


You could choose if you want to keep a contact, when somebody *offers* to be your contact. The "offering" is kinda important here, because usually the townie just foists themselves on you, deciding that they're indebted to the saviour who brought their friend's killer to justice (doesn't that get *so* annoying? :D) If this change is effected, people who already have their contacts could change any contacts they wished to by 1) the VH-co-conspirator-contact-betrayal method (which could maybe be implemented...?) or 2) something else (??)


Then there's the massive pay-off method.


And the retirement method. Which comes with unwanted side-effects (the unpreventable ones being losing Faction standings (are Shangri-La faction standings affected?)) and loss of skill points and XP proportionate to the skill points lost (which isn't that much of a big deal for dets who've already got all their skills, and don't really need the skill points, most of which are lying unused (not counting their usage in the search for artefacts) anyway. And losing XP does nothing more than bruise your ego, unless there's some other dastardly effect I've missed).

  <<First Page  |  <Previous  

[ You must login to reply ]