anjg
|
Oct-30-2004 01:16
could it be possible, that whoever suspects someone, i mean when getting the motives, could the person who gets chosen the most could be the killer? i mean whenever we ask for motives, then a few people might point to the same person!!
|
jstkdn
Well-Connected
|
Oct-30-2004 16:45
Hmmm. If I am really honest, I never paid attention to things like what the screens say in between say (other then those that are relevant for the factions), or the (un)tidyness of the murder scene. I am not entirely convinced if during questioning if "washing the blood from their hands" weighs heavier then "had a fight with the victim", or the motives.
Frankly, the only time I read anything, is when I see someone wrote a new intro.
|
Moonshh
Well-Connected
|
Oct-30-2004 21:05
Me too! *agrees with jstkdn, even if she posted FIRST*
Also, I nearly jumped out of my seat the first time I saw the twist with Larry the Toe!
I don't think the content of the witness evidence matters - just the quantity. Two witness see something, and the person provably has no valid alibi? Guilty!
Even if the two people saw that suspect with the watch of the victim, and some other suspect was washing off blood or tried to kill the victim before - which, if the content meant anything, I would think would be more damning evidence!
As to the number of people who name the suspect when queried about motive, I suspect it doesn't mean anything, either. But it might be interesting to keep track and see if a pattern emerges or not.
Thing is, I don't like to waste questions after I have my suspect list complete, so I would never find out which suspects make the list for everyone.
|