|
|
Things that ought to work, but don't...
|
Serges
Vigilante
|
Jan-16-2007 16:47
I just thought about this last night. When you have handwriting analysis and lockpicking, it only seems to follow that you should be able to determine either a suspect's handedness, or, be able to confirm or eliminate them as a match to your threatening notes, since you'll either find a journal or appointment book, both of which provide samples of the suspect's handwriting.
I'm not calling for a change here, since the system works just fine without it... but I was wondering if anyone else has thought of a similar situation where it seems like something would work but isnt written into the game.
|
Replies |
Hawkeye Harris
Battered Shoe
|
Jan-19-2007 09:19
I think this may have been addressed before, but I would like to see a “None” alibi show up on the suspect screen when discovered via lockpicking. After all, the detective would probably write this in his little black book, right? :)
When I solve, I like to “see” either PE on case screen plus fake/none alibi on suspect screen, or two WE’s for same suspect on case screen – this is a great way to avoid FA’s.
Yes, I can go back and question suspect to get the “no alibi”, but it uses up a question that might be needed elsewhere.
Just MHO :)
|
Adam Carter
Big Winner
|
Jan-19-2007 09:35
How about, when checking PE, only having those who could match on the list. So if you visit the barber to investigate a curly hair you found at the scene, all the people you know have straight hair could be removed from the list. It would make matching PE easier.
|
biggie528
Lucky Stiff
|
Jan-19-2007 09:41
I was literally opening this thread to say just that Adam :)
|
|