|
|
|
Palermitano
|
Aug-11-2006 10:48
What if the only evidence you have is a handwriting sample?
|
Replies |
Secret_Squirrel
Safety Officer
|
Aug-21-2006 19:03
This is fast becoming my favoutite thread, for to use a car-racing analogy, y'all "Driving round in circles threatening to disappear up your own exhaust pipes" :D
|
Reese Withers
Well-Connected
|
Aug-21-2006 19:34
lol :)
|
Manfred Lurker
|
Aug-21-2006 21:23
Youth and old age....oh my!
|
Josepha Nickell
|
Aug-21-2006 23:35
This thread sort of reminds me of the caucus race in Alice in Wonderland!
|
Greyling
|
Aug-22-2006 00:48
And anyway if it comes to that, Shady will always be there to help out before any potential retirement :)
|
Josepha Nickell
|
This reply has been deleted by a Moderator
|
Josepha Nickell
|
This reply has been deleted by a Moderator
|
Josepha Nickell
|
Aug-22-2006 11:49
I also have to remember what Grissom said to Warrick on CSI: Always listen to the evidence!
|
Colline Evans
|
Aug-22-2006 17:34
Although , let's say you have two guilty parties: one with a false alibi and the other without one ; isn't the one without innocent of the crime while the one with the false alibi guilty? Or the person who was killed has a real alibi while the accused has a false alibi?
|
Colline Evans
|
Aug-22-2006 17:36
Something else I have to remember is that the evidence sometimes decieves.
|
|