Sleuth Home - Message Boards - The Gumshoe Lounge


0 0
Headhunters
  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

Madame TBird
Madame TBird
Well-Connected

Jan-25-2006 22:10

How do y'all feel about agencies recruiting detectives at your agency? Does it hurt y'all whne long term detectives leave? Maybe I'm cynical but I look at my fellow sleuths as family & it gets me down in the dumps when they resign, only to take up residence elsewhere.

Replies

cfm
cfm
Nomad

Jan-26-2006 07:06

*kicks Anstett the moment she reads his "headhunting is a good thing*

No, you don't HAVE to be the devils advocate here! *not knowing whether she wants to grin or glare at him* Poaching is rude and unacceptable.

*grumbles at him a bit more then mumbles something about having work to do and stomps off, prepared to argue with him later if she has to*

R Anstett
R Anstett

Jan-26-2006 08:18

Rubs his shin ruefully.

If you read it again, I said poaching is bad, headhunting is good.

Poaching = sneaking and stealing detectives without talking to the director

Headhunting = talk to the director about hiring away one of their detectives.



jwonie2
jwonie2

Jan-26-2006 16:48

poaching + headhunting = taking agencies too seriously.

think about it, all the detective agencys on TV and in books are a few friends at most, and are usually barely in the black.

i always thought the idea of an agency was to add a social and collabrative dimension to the game, not to create a cutthroat detective market.

so yes i agree with cfm, all her reasons to change agencies were the right ones. A wrong reason would be because of above or below table negotiations trading you like an "asset"

R Anstett
R Anstett

Jan-26-2006 17:13

I think that taking an agency seriously includes two things.

Being subscribed. Yes you have to subscribe to join, but you can let it lapse and still remain in the agency. Many agencies out there have Directors that are not subscribed. I personally would like to see a change that upon your subscription running out you are no longer part of an agency.

The second is the act of participating in the agency. This does not mean hunting, or doing a ton of cases, it means participating in the agency part of the game. Perhaps that is just roleplaying more, or becoming a mentor to younger detectives. Some of us like the challenge and competition of the score boards, not everyone should feel that is important to their enjoyment.

I would hope that the members of Mojo feel like they are assets *to* the agency (and not *of* the agency) and they feel good about belonging to our agency.

Makensie Brewer
Makensie Brewer
Super Steeper

Jan-26-2006 17:57

*raises hand* I have to respectfully disagree about when you're unsubbed your time runs out in an agency. I think it should be the Directors choice whether they keep unsubbed or not. Ya see, because...*clears throat*... I am one of them people that sometimes the subscription runs out and I cant always pay right on time each time *sigh* and I really love Mojo's and I would HATE to automatically be kicked out. *sigh* Ran , you are wonderful but I have to disagree with you, just this time :o) *runs quickly back to the depressing field office*

cfm
cfm
Nomad

Jan-26-2006 18:08

Mak, I agree with you. There are agencies that won't tolerate unsubbed players, but I think that it should be a choice that the agencies have. I've worked with a lot of detectives that, for whatever reason, will occasionally let their subs lapse. I've even been known to go a short time in the land of the banner ads. :)

LilRach
LilRach
Well-Connected

Jan-26-2006 18:28

Yes, and sometimes you don't realize you are unsubbed. Directors do so much to help the newer players, that they might not play all their cases.

Or, in my case. I am a poor college student. And if it comes between rent and one month without my subscription, I choose rent.

I think this should be each person's own choice.

R Anstett
R Anstett

Jan-26-2006 18:29

I understand those points, and do not want to seem cruel. I wonder what the balance is between having an agency full of active but unsubscribed players.

Is it fair for an agency to have unsubscribed directors and a bunch of rookie detectives that are subscribed to do the running from city to city?

jwonie2
jwonie2

Jan-26-2006 18:31

i guess the rookies have to decide that

Lady Emerald Devon
Lady Emerald Devon
Nomad

Jan-26-2006 18:33

N, Ran, perhaps not. However, those agents don't have to be in that agency IF they think it's unfair.
There are plently of agencies and those rookies can leave.
The whole point is, that there IS a place for everyone in Sleuth.
To say, that people aren't allowed to stay in an agency if they are unsubbed is unfair. It's up to the people in an agency to decide that.


  <<First Page  |  <Previous Next>  |  Last Page>>  

[ You must login to reply ]